
Barack Obama, the sitting US president, receives the nobel peace prize and it’s in every major media. The award is certainly a surprise to most people, but also very controversial. There’s definitely a polarization of opinions, most of the harshest critique appears to originate from right-wing commentators noting that he’s "done nothing".
I for one, wouldn’t say that. While most of Obama’s initiatives as still in mid-process, he’s only been in office for ~10 months mind you, they are there. He’s closing Guantanamo, he’s opened a dialogue with Iran, he’s dismantled the robot defense plans in Europe, he’s actively pushing for an end to the war in iraq, and he wants to dismantle a large part of the nuclear weapons arsenal. These are definately the signs of a leader preparing for peace, instead of war.
When you think of it, this decision is not at all inconsistent with the peace prize committee, remember Arafat, Rabin and Peres? They got the 1994 prize, practically just for talking to each other. And there’s still no peace in the middle east. For Obama, the committee motivated their decision as:
"His extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples."
Obama’s changed the attitude of the world’s most powerful nation from world-police to world-citizen. He’s creating a more unified future for all mankind. You get the peace prize for your efforts, not for the results. So I want finish this post with the following sentiment:
Congratulations Obama, we hope your legacy will live up to the hope you have for humanity, and the hope humanity has for you!
Media: BBC, CNN, NY-Times
DN, SvD, Aftonbladet, Metro (sw)